|
National priorities – outcomes, performance measures and quality indicators
The national priorities team are reviewing the outcomes, and associated performance measures and quality indicators as listed below. They have consulted with staff in education authorities, asking for their suggestions on how they can be modified in the light of our experience in using them and with reference to the Curriculum for Excellence. As this edition goes to the printers, we are awaiting the revision from the Scottish Executive Education Department based on the outcome of their consultation.
National priority one
|
Outcome 1: Raised standards of educational attainment for all, especially in the core
skills of literacy and numeracy |
|
1.1.A % of combined P3, P4, P6 and P7 rolls meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14
level for their age in reading, writing and maths
1.1.B % of S2 who have met or exceeded level E in reading, writing and maths, by end of
S2
1.1.C % of the original S4 cohort who, by the end of S6, have attained SCQF level 3 or
better in English and Maths
1.1.D Whole school targets set for pupils with Individualised educational programmes
(IEPs) |
|
Outcome 2: Improved examination results or other measures of improvement |
|
1.2.A % of original S4 cohort who, be end S6, have attained 5+ awards at SCQF level 3
or better (3 year average)
1.2.B % of original S4 cohort who, by end S6, have attained 5+ awards at SCQF level 4
or better (3 year average)
1.2.C % of original S4 cohort who, by end S6, have attained 5+ awards at SCQF level 5
or better (3 year average)
1.2.D % of original S4 cohort who, by end S6, have attained 1+ awards at SCQF level 6 or better (3 year average)
1.2.E % of original S4 cohort who, by end S6, have attained 3+ awards at SCQF level 6 or better (3 year average)
1.2.F % of original S4 cohort who, by end S6, have attained 5+ awards at SCQF level 6
or better (3 year average)
1.2.G Quality Indicator 2.1 from How good is our school? 2 – Overall quality of attainment
1.2.H Quality Indicator 5.2 from How good is our school? 2 – Expectations and
promoting achievement |
National priority two
|
Outcome 1: Continuing professional development of teachers' skills |
|
2.1.A A Recognition that monitoring arrangements are already in place nationally and locally. No additional measure will be introduced. Local authorities expected to
report on local progress and local targets in relation to CPD.
2.1.B Quality Indicator 6.6 from How good is our school? 2– Staff development
and review |
|
Outcome 2: Increased self-discipline of pupils |
|
2.2.A Levels of attendance
2.2.B Number of days lost per 1000 pupils through exclusion. Local targets can be set
(optional)
2.2.C Number and % of pupils participating in buddying, mentoring or similar schemes to
be locally defined as appropriate
2.2.D Quality indicator 5.1 from How good is our school? 2- Climate and relationships |
|
Outcome 3: Enhance school environments which are more conducive to teaching and learning |
|
2.3.A Pupil:adult ratio in primary schools
2.3.B % of schools (primary and secondary separately) classified as Health Promoting
Schools
2.3.C % of schools (primary and secondary separately) with quality award or applying a
quality model
2.3.D Quality Indicator 6.1 from How good is our school? 2 – Accommodation and
facilities (report to include the number of schools with support bases) |
|
Search NorthWeb
